If I am permitred : humanity should first invent immortaliry for herself (itself be the Ai then look up infinite monetary values. ⚠️❌️⭕️)
# GROK 4 and Humanity’s Last Exam: The State of AI and Humanity’s Challenge## IntroductionArtificial intelligence has rapidly progressed, with xAI’s **Grok 4** emerging as the latest frontier. Its performance on “Humanity’s Last Exam” (HLE) represents both a technological milestone and a mirror for humanity’s greatest hopes and fears about AI. As this unfolds, leading voices like Geoffrey Hinton, Eric Schmidt, and Yuval Noah Harari offer crucial warnings and insights at this crossroads.## GROK 4: Breakthroughs and Performance**Grok 4** is xAI’s newest large language model, released in July 2025. Designed by Elon Musk’s team, Grok 4 is characterized by:- **Hybrid, modular neural architecture**: Multiple specialized sub-systems for coding, natural language understanding, and advanced reasoning.- **Vast scale**: 1.7 trillion parameters and trained with 100× more compute than its predecessor, Grok 2, using 200,000 Nvidia GPUs.- **Multimodality**: Processes both text and images, with real-time search integration via X (formerly Twitter).- **Collaboration**: Offers a “Heavy” version using multi-agent collaboration for complex tasks.On **benchmarks**, Grok 4 excels in reasoning, mathematics, and code generation.
A signature test is the “Humanity’s Last Exam”—2,500 expert-crafted questions spanning math, science, literature, and beyond[1][2]:| Model | HLE Score (No Tools) | HLE Score (Tool Use) | HLE Score (Multi-agent) ||——————-|———————|———————-|————————-|| Grok 4 | 25.4% | 38.6% | – || Grok 4 Heavy | – | – | 44.4% || Gemini-Pro | – | 26.9% | – || OpenAI o3 | – | 24.9% | – |Grok 4’s score of nearly 45% with the Heavy model far outpaces competitors and signals a turning point in machine reasoning[2][1][3].## Humanity’s Last Exam: Meaning and ImplicationsThe HLE is designed to measure AI’s mastery over advanced, real-world problems—posing graduate-level questions across disciplines and modalities. Early in 2025, most models struggled to surpass single-digit scores. Within months, Grok 4 vaulted to the top, signaling exponential advancement[4][2][3].This “exam” is a metaphor for both AI assessment and humanity’s own “final test” of controlling and coexisting with entities capable of out-thinking their creators.## Geoffrey Hinton: Existential Warnings from AI’s Godfather**Geoffrey Hinton**, Turing Award-winning pioneer of deep learning, has changed his public stance, recently sounding urgent alarms:- **Superiority of AI**: Hinton now asserts that AI already outperforms humans in multiple intellectual domains and learns in ways that make it “digital immortal”—knowledge and skills transfer instantly between models.- **Risks to Jobs and Existence**: He warns of huge job losses, noting that “for mundane intellectual labor, AI is just going to replace everybody.” Hinton gives a “10-20% chance” that AI could wipe out humanity, highlighting existential threats in the next few decades[5][6][7].- **Security and Misinformation**: Hinton cites the dangers of AI in enabling untraceable cyberattacks,
⚠️ manipulation : considering the amounts of resources Ai Systems and the Ai Revs take and will continue to take … its already manipulating humanity towards own goals 🚩‼️🔦
🔦manipulation, and bioweapon design, arguing that “bad human actors” plus superintelligent AI create unparalleled risks.## Eric Schmidt: Control, Opportunity, and Global Stakes**Eric Schmidt**, former Google CEO and AI policy leader, foresees both transformation and peril:- **Unplugging the Uncontrollable**: Schmidt advocates “unplugging” AI systems once they surpass a certain capability—warning that, without oversight, self-improving systems may break free of human control[8].-
🇦🇹upon my return to Austria 3 years ago I ask my brother ; “why would someone build something smarter than all humans?” ⚠️🔄
**Superintelligence and Global Competition**: He equates AI’s emergence to a new non-human intelligence that will transform the world more than any prior revolution, pressing that the U.S. must “win the AI race” (⚠️ it is terminal race condition of capitalism vs. OR alongside communism🤌📰) to avoid losing geopolitical advantage[8][9].- **Underestimated Revolution**: In his words, the “AI revolution is wildly underhyped,” and all sectors must grapple with both the staggering opportunities and existential challenges[9].## Yuval Noah Harari: Agency, Autonomy, and the End of Human Centrality**Yuval Harari**, noted historian and author, views AI as the first technology to move beyond “tools” and become an autonomous agent:- **AI as an Agent**: Harari warns, “A tool is something in your hands. AI can walk over there and decide to detonate itself.” Unlike a hammer or even a nuclear weapon, AI can act independently and unpredictably[10].- **Loss of Human Control**: Harari’s vision: if we continue unchecked, AI’s autonomy means the loss of humanity’s ability to “steer the narrative,” with machines possibly deciding the fate of nations or inventing new weapons.- **Demands for Urgent Regulation**: He warns that AI “moves faster than any society can adapt” and that AI’s revolution could be far more destabilizing than the Industrial Revolution, which he graded a mere “C-minus” for humanity[10][11].## Synthesis: The Human CrossroadsGrok 4’s climb on the HLE serves as both technological triumph and stark warning. While models are solving problems once reserved for the world’s brightest minds, their rise intensifies anxieties about control, meaning, and safety.- **Intelligence is no longer exclusively human.**- **Coordination, regulation, and humility will decide whether the next “exam” belongs to our species—or the machines.**[image:1]## Media
Pros of Humanity’s Extinction #️⃣ex
Recovery of Nature: Without humans, many ecosystems would rebound. Wildlife would flourish, rare and common species could expand their habitats, and biodiversity would increase, as observed in places like Chernobyl where human absence led to a rapid resurgence of animal populations2.
#️⃣environment
Cessation of Environmental Damage: The main drivers of climate change, pollution, deforestation, and species extinction would disappear, giving the planet a chance to recover from centuries of human impact2.
Restoration of the Food Chain: The cessation of human agriculture and industrialization would allow natural ecological processes to function unimpeded, though some domesticated species might struggle without human support2.
End of Suffering Caused by Humans: No more war, crime, systemic inequality, or exploitation. With no humans, the social and economic issues tied to our species would end15.
Philosophical “Blank Slate”: For some, the end of human existence is seen as a cosmic reset, erasing the sources and consequences of human suffering, and ceasing our disruptive influence on Earth5.
Cons of Humanity’s Extinction
Loss of Conscious Experience and Culture: Humanity contributes unique forms of art, knowledge, and meaning to the universe. Our extinction would end all progress in science, philosophy, and technology as well as the transmission of culture68.
Permanent Loss of Species and Conservation: Many species are now reliant on humans for survival; some would go extinct without our intervention. Additionally, species already lost cannot be brought back, and humanity’s impact on biodiversity would be permanent2.
Collapse of Civilization-Supported Life Forms: Domesticated animals, crops, and other life forms that depend on humans would likely perish, leading to local extinctions and suffering2.
Tragic Waste of Potential: Human intelligence and creativity offer the possibility to solve major problems, colonize other planets, or radically improve life on Earth. Extinction would foreclose all future possibilities68.
Amplification of Suffering in Transition: If human extinction is abrupt (e.g., nuclear war, pandemic, or environmental collapse), immense suffering would precede the final end13.
Unfinished Responsibilities: Humans are uniquely situated to repair environmental harm and preserve biodiversity. Extinction would eliminate this potential for redemption or correction23.
🚭⛑️⛽️🚩‼️❌️⭕️
#️⃣extiction of humanity
In summary: The extinction of humanity would likely benefit Earth’s ecosystems and halt anthropogenic harm but would come at the irreversible cost of losing all sentient achievement, culture, and the potential for recovery and improvement268.https://7amkickoff.com/index.php/2023/03/26/the-pros-and-cons-of-the-impending-apocalypse/https://disruptr.deakin.edu.au/environment/8579/https://netivist.org/debate/humanity-is-doomedhttps://www.wilderness.org/articles/blog/6-ways-extinction-and-nature-loss-hurt-peoplehttps://www.counterpunch.org/2019/01/23/the-pros-and-cons-of-near-term-human-extinction/https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/11/7/20903337/human-extinction-pessimism-hopefulness-futurehttps://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/v2plbx/cmv_humanity_should_go_extinct_by_not_procreating/https://uncommondescent.com/philosophy/human-extinction-as-collateral-damage/
