Its only about 2 main things in this life, people and loneliness. all else is just … dust.
Now since imay have catched your attention , or not, I would not know but what I do know is ….
SUGAR is very addictive and what I do know is that its very easy to just destroy enything in minutes and vreak up and break upand break down, yeh instead on continuous building up and forming unions and making peace and balance and harmony,
corrupted . EOF.
#️⃣human after all or Cyborg ?
https://macoway.eu/humanity-last-exam-warnings-philosophers-scientist-people/Am studiat putin ieri seara / noapte despre Ibrahim Traore – Burkina Faso.**Pros of Humanity’s Extinction**- **Recovery of Nature:** Without humans, many ecosystems would rebound. Wildlife would flourish, rare and common species could expand their habitats, and biodiversity would increase, as observed in places like Chernobyl where human absence led to a rapid resurgence of animal populations[2].- **Cessation of Environmental Damage:** The main drivers of climate change, pollution, deforestation, and species extinction would disappear, giving the planet a chance to recover from centuries of human impact[2].- **Restoration of the Food Chain:** The cessation of human agriculture and industrialization would allow natural ecological processes to function unimpeded, though some domesticated species might struggle without human support[2].- **End of Suffering Caused by Humans:** No more war, crime, systemic inequality, or exploitation. With no humans, the social and economic issues tied to our species would end[1][5].- **Philosophical “Blank Slate”:** For some, the end of human existence is seen as a cosmic reset, erasing the sources and consequences of human suffering, and ceasing our disruptive influence on Earth[5].**Cons of Humanity’s Extinction**- **Loss of Conscious Experience and Culture:** Humanity contributes unique forms of art, knowledge, and meaning to the universe. Our extinction would end all progress in science, philosophy, and technology as well as the transmission of culture[6][8].- **Permanent Loss of Species and Conservation:** Many species are now reliant on humans for survival; some would go extinct without our intervention. Additionally, species already lost cannot be brought back, and humanity’s impact on biodiversity would be permanent[2].- **Collapse of Civilization-Supported Life Forms:** Domesticated animals, crops, and other life forms that depend on humans would likely perish, leading to local extinctions and suffering[2].- **Tragic Waste of Potential:** Human intelligence and creativity offer the possibility to solve major problems, colonize other planets, or radically improve life on Earth. Extinction would foreclose all future possibilities[6][8].- **Amplification of Suffering in Transition:** If human extinction is abrupt (e.g., nuclear war, pandemic, or environmental collapse), immense suffering would precede the final end[1][3].- **Unfinished Responsibilities:** Humans are uniquely situated to repair environmental harm and preserve biodiversity. Extinction would eliminate this potential for redemption or correction[2][3].**In summary:** The extinction of humanity would likely benefit Earth’s ecosystems and halt anthropogenic harm but would come at the irreversible cost of losing all sentient achievement, culture, and the potential for recovery and improvement[2][6][8].[1] https://7amkickoff.com/index.php/2023/03/26/the-pros-and-cons-of-the-impending-apocalypse/[2] https://disruptr.deakin.edu.au/environment/8579/[3] https://netivist.org/debate/humanity-is-doomed[4] https://www.wilderness.org/articles/blog/6-ways-extinction-and-nature-loss-hurt-people[5] https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/01/23/the-pros-and-cons-of-near-term-human-extinction/[6] https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/11/7/20903337/human-extinction-pessimism-hopefulness-future[7] https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/v2plbx/cmv_humanity_should_go_extinct_by_not_procreating/[8] https://uncommondescent.com/philosophy/human-extinction-as-collateral-damage/
